How to Create an Online Course
How to create an online course step by step: define the learner, test demand, write objectives, outline lessons, add practice and tests, then pilot and launch.
Last updated 10 min read
Key takeaways
A learning objective states what a learner will be able to do at the end of a unit of teaching. The key word is do. “This module covers supply and demand” describes content. “Learners will predict how a price ceiling changes the quantity supplied, using a supply and demand diagram” describes a performance you can watch, mark or test. That difference is the whole point: an objective is written so that both you and the learner can tell whether it has been met.
The surrounding terms are used loosely, so it helps to know the distinctions most course designers draw:
A widely taught way to write objectives is the ABCD format. It builds on Robert Mager's work on instructional objectives, which held that a useful objective states the performance, the conditions under which it happens, and the criterion for success. ABCD adds the audience, giving four parts:
Combined, the parts read like this: “Given a short news article, learners will identify its main claim and two pieces of supporting evidence, quoting each accurately.” Not every objective needs all four written out. Lesson-level objectives often leave the audience implicit, and the degree may live in the marking scheme instead. Drafting with all four still forces you to decide what success looks like, which is the hard and useful part of the exercise.
The verb is the most important word in a learning objective, and Bloom's taxonomy is the standard tool for choosing it. The original framework was published in 1956 by a group led by Benjamin Bloom. A revised version published in 2001 by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl renamed the levels as verbs, and it is the version most widely used today. It orders six kinds of thinking from simpler to more complex:
Higher is not automatically better. An introductory lesson may rightly aim at remembering and understanding, because learners cannot analyze material they cannot yet recall. And the verb should describe the thinking the assessment will actually require: analyze on paper means nothing if the test only asks learners to recognize a definition.
| Level | What the learner does | Useful verbs | Example objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remember | Recalls facts and terms | list, name, define, recall | List the three branches of the US federal government |
| Understand | Explains ideas in their own words | explain, summarize, classify, paraphrase | Summarize the argument of a journal article in one paragraph |
| Apply | Uses a method in a new case | calculate, solve, use, demonstrate | Calculate the compound interest on a five-year loan |
| Analyze | Breaks material into parts and sees how they relate | compare, differentiate, organize, attribute | Compare two translations of the same poem for tone and meaning |
| Evaluate | Makes a judgment using criteria | assess, critique, justify, defend | Assess the credibility of three sources against stated criteria |
| Create | Produces something new and coherent | design, compose, construct, plan | Design a two-week revision schedule for a final exam |
Whether you are writing for a single lesson or a whole course, the process is the same:
Weak objectives tend to fail in a few predictable ways: a verb you cannot observe, a missing object, a description of the teacher's activity instead of the learner's, or a scope too large for one lesson. These rewrites show the difference.
The stronger versions carry more detail, and that is normal. A useful test is whether two different teachers, given the same objective, would write roughly the same assessment for it. If the objective leaves them guessing, it is still too vague.
| Weak objective | Problem | Stronger version |
|---|---|---|
| Understand photosynthesis | Understanding cannot be observed directly | Explain, using a labeled diagram, how light energy is converted into chemical energy during photosynthesis |
| Learn about the causes of World War I | Describes exposure, not a performance | Rank four causes of World War I by importance and justify the ranking with evidence |
| The instructor will demonstrate pivot tables | Describes what the teacher does | Build a pivot table that summarizes monthly sales by region from a raw dataset |
| Master Spanish verbs | Scope far too large, with no condition | Conjugate regular -ar verbs in the present tense without a reference table |
| Appreciate Romantic poetry | An attitude, not a checkable skill | Identify two features of Romantic poetry in an unseen poem and explain their effect |
Objectives earn their keep only when the rest of the course follows them. The education researcher John Biggs called this constructive alignment: objectives, teaching activities and assessments should all point at the same performance. If an objective asks learners to evaluate sources, the lesson should give them practice evaluating sources with feedback, and the test should ask them to evaluate a source, not to define credibility.
A simple audit makes misalignment visible. List your objectives down one side of a page and your assessment items across the top, then mark which items test which objectives. An objective with no marks is not being checked. An item with no matching objective is testing something you never promised to teach. For ideas on checks that test real thinking rather than recall, see designing assessments AI can't fake.
Share the objectives with learners at the start of each lesson. They preview what matters and let learners check their own progress, which is especially useful in self-paced courses where nobody else is checking.
Objectives work at different scales. A course might have a handful of broad outcomes, each module a few objectives that build toward them, and each lesson one to three narrow ones. The levels should nest: every lesson objective serves a module objective, and every module objective serves a course outcome. If a lesson objective serves nothing above it, question whether the lesson belongs.
Resist listing everything a lesson touches. A long list dilutes attention and is hard to assess honestly. Ask whether you will write at least one assessment item for each objective; if not, it is a topic rather than an objective, and it can appear in the lesson without being promised. For how objectives fit into the wider build, see how to create an online course.
How to create an online course step by step: define the learner, test demand, write objectives, outline lessons, add practice and tests, then pilot and launch.
PDF to course, step by step: audit your notes or slides, write down what you used to say aloud, split it into lessons, add tests and pilot it before launch.
Turning a book or PDF into an online course means building a syllabus, lessons and tests around it. Here is how to structure that course, step by step.
In common usage, a learning objective states what a lesson or module intends learners to be able to do, while a learning outcome describes what learners can demonstrably do once a course is complete, often at a broader level. Many institutions use the two terms interchangeably. What matters more than the label is that the statement names an observable performance you can assess.
Avoid verbs that describe a state of mind rather than an action: understand, know, learn, appreciate, be aware of and be familiar with. You cannot observe them directly, so you cannot check them. Replace each with the action that would show it, such as explain, identify, compare or apply. Broad course goals can use softer language, but lesson objectives should not.
Usually one to three. A lesson that teaches one idea well rarely needs more, and every objective you list should be matched by at least one assessment item. If a lesson seems to need many objectives, it is often trying to cover too much and would work better split into two or more shorter lessons.
ABCD stands for audience, behavior, condition and degree. Audience is who will perform the task, behavior is the observable action, condition is the circumstances or tools involved, and degree is the standard for success. For example: given a balance sheet, learners will calculate the current ratio with no arithmetic errors. Not every objective spells out all four, but drafting with them sharpens the statement.
They should be observable, which in practice makes them assessable. Some aims, such as curiosity or appreciation of a subject, matter but cannot be checked directly. Those belong in course goals. Where possible, translate them into behaviors that would show them, such as choosing to read a further text or defending a preference with evidence from the work.
SMART stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. The checklist comes from management goal-setting and is often applied to learning objectives. It overlaps with ABCD: specific and measurable match the behavior and degree, and time-bound is a kind of condition, such as by the end of the module. ABCD is usually more practical for lesson objectives because it forces an observable verb; SMART is a useful final check that an objective is realistic.
Upload a manuscript or a PDF and Cavua builds the syllabus, lessons and tests — you edit and approve everything before it publishes.