Chicago Style Citation: Notes-Bibliography and Author-Date
Chicago citation in the 17th edition: how footnotes and shortened notes work, author-date in-text citations, and bibliography examples for books and articles.
Last updated 9 min read
Key takeaways
Paraphrasing means taking one idea from a source and expressing it in your own words and sentence structure, at roughly the same level of detail as the original. It is not a quotation, which keeps the author's exact words, and it is not a summary, which shrinks a long passage to its main point. A paraphrase of a three-sentence passage might run two or three sentences. A summary of the same passage might be a single clause; the guide to writing an annotated bibliography shows how to summarize a whole source in a few sentences.
Instructors ask for paraphrase because it shows you understood the source. Anyone can copy a sentence, but restating it accurately in different words requires you to know what it means, how its parts relate, and which qualifications matter. Paraphrase also keeps your paper in one voice: an essay assembled from quotations sounds like a collage, while one built on paraphrase sounds like an argument you are making.
What paraphrasing does not do is make the idea yours. The citation stays, however thoroughly you rewrite. The guide to avoiding plagiarism explains where paraphrase fits alongside quoting and citing.
The method below works for a sentence, a paragraph or a dense page. Its core is step three, writing while the source is out of sight. Most weak paraphrases come from rewriting a sentence while looking at it, which pulls your version into the author's structure no matter how hard you try.
Here is a sample passage written for this guide. Suppose it appears on page 112 of a 2020 book by an author named Chen: “Most readers treat the footnotes in a history book as optional, but the notes are where a historian shows which claims rest on documents and which rest on inference.” Below are three attempts at paraphrasing it, from weakest to strongest.
The third attempt is the one to aim for, and it helps to see why before you read it. It opens with Chen's argument rather than the readers' habit, it replaces the documents-versus-inference pairing with an explanation of what that pairing lets a reader do, and it keeps the idea and the credit firmly with Chen. Nothing in it would look like a copied sentence to a reader holding the book. The first two show the most common ways to fall short:
Before you rework a sentence, know what to leave alone. Technical terms such as “photosynthesis,” “opportunity cost” or “habeas corpus,” proper names and standard units have no accurate synonyms, and forcing one in makes your writing less precise. Keep them. What you must not keep is the author's distinctive phrasing: the memorable metaphor, the unusual adjective, the recognizable rhythm of a sentence.
Writing from memory does most of the work, but when a sentence still comes out sounding like the original, these moves help. Use several together, since any one alone tends to leave the author's skeleton visible:
Every paraphrase needs a citation, and the format depends on your style. In APA 7th edition, give the author and year, either in your sentence, as in Chen (2020) argues that the notes deserve attention, or in parentheses at the end, (Chen, 2020). APA does not require a page number for a paraphrase but encourages one when it would help a reader find the passage, as in (Chen, 2020, p. 112).
In MLA 9th edition, the parenthetical citation is the author and page with no comma, (Chen 112), or just the page if you named the author in your sentence. In Chicago notes and bibliography style, you place a note number at the end of the sentence and give the source and page in the footnote. In every style, the full source also goes in your reference list. The Chicago style citation guide covers note formats in detail.
Signal phrases credit the author and show where borrowed material begins. Choose the verb to match what the source actually does: argues, finds, suggests, describes, warns, disputes. That choice is a small act of interpretation, and it tells your reader how strongly the source makes its claim.
One shortcut deserves a warning first. Automatic rewording tools mostly perform the synonym swap described above, which leaves the original structure intact, and they can distort meaning without warning. Many courses treat their use as unauthorized assistance. Even where they are allowed, they skip the step that makes paraphrasing worthwhile: understanding an idea well enough to say it yourself.
Beyond tools, most problems come from a handful of habits. Check each paraphrase in your draft against this list before you submit:
Paraphrase is the default, but not always the right choice. Quote when the wording itself is your evidence: a line of poetry or dialogue you are about to analyze, the exact terms of a law or treaty, a definition your argument depends on, or a phrase so well known that rewording it would be strange. Quote also when the author's word choice is your point, for instance when you argue that a historian's language reveals a bias.
If you keep failing to paraphrase a passage, notice what that tells you. It usually means you do not yet understand it, not that it cannot be paraphrased. Read the surrounding pages, try explaining it aloud, then try again. The SQ3R reading method gives you a step-by-step way through passages that refuse to make sense.
The hardest part of paraphrasing is not the rewording but understanding the passage well enough to rewrite it, and Cavua's Work space is built for that step. Upload the article or chapter you are working from and ask the tutor what a confusing paragraph is claiming. Answers point to the page, so you can go straight back to the original wording when you compare your version against it, and “Quiz me” checks that you have the idea before you start writing.
Speaking is a good test of understanding, so you can also video or voice call the tutor about your document and explain the passage back in your own words; how much call time you get depends on your plan. The tutor helps you understand the source, and the sentence you write stays yours. There is more on how it works on the AI tutor page.
Chicago citation in the 17th edition: how footnotes and shortened notes work, author-date in-text citations, and bibliography examples for books and articles.
Learn how to write an abstract step by step: what to include, how long it should be, a move-by-move template, an annotated example and the mistakes to avoid.
MLA citation in the 9th edition: the nine core elements, author–page in-text citations, and Works Cited examples for books, articles, websites and films.
Qualitative vs quantitative research explained: what each studies, the data and methods they use, paired examples, and how to choose one for your project.
What an AI research assistant can do for students, what it can't, how to test one before you rely on it, and what to keep out of the files you upload to it.
APA citation in the 7th edition: in-text rules for one, two and three or more authors, plus reference formats for articles, books, chapters and webpages.
Yes. A paraphrase restates someone else's idea, so it needs a citation even when every word is your own. In APA, cite the author and year, with a page number encouraged; in MLA, the author and page; in Chicago notes style, a footnote. Leaving the citation off turns an otherwise correct paraphrase into plagiarism.
A paraphrase restates one specific idea at about the same level of detail as the original, so it is roughly as long as the passage it replaces. A summary condenses a longer passage, chapter or whole work into its main point and leaves out examples and detail. Both use your own words, and both need a citation.
Change both the words and the sentence structure while keeping the meaning exactly. Compare your version with the original side by side: if the clauses appear in the same order, or a distinctive phrase survives, keep rewriting. Technical terms and names can stay, since they have no accurate substitutes.
Usually, yes. Replacing some words with synonyms while keeping the original structure is called patchwriting, and most integrity policies treat it as plagiarism even with a citation, because the sentence is still essentially the author's. Either quote the original exactly in quotation marks, or rewrite the idea from scratch and cite it.
It depends on your course, and many instructors treat automatic rewording tools as unauthorized help. These tools also tend to produce synonym swaps that keep the original structure, and they can change the meaning. Check your syllabus first. Writing the paraphrase yourself from memory is safer and shows you understood the source.
Roughly as long as the original passage. If your version is much shorter, you have probably written a summary, which is fine if that is what you need. If it is much longer, you may be adding your own interpretation, which belongs in a separate sentence so readers can tell your view apart from the source's.
Every Cavua course comes with a 24/7 tutor you can video call, speak to or chat with — on the material you are actually studying.