How to Write a Conclusion
How to write a conclusion that does more than summarize: restate your thesis in a new light, connect your points, and end on why it matters. With examples.
Last updated 8 min read
Key takeaways
A compare and contrast essay puts two or more subjects — texts, thinkers, events, theories, policies — side by side and explains what the pairing reveals. Comparing means identifying similarities; contrasting means identifying differences. Most assignments want both, even when the prompt uses only one word.
The common failure is the essay that lists: “Both novels were published in the nineteenth century. Both follow a young woman. One is set partly in a school.” Each sentence is accurate, and together they prove nothing. A strong comparison has a purpose. It might show that two subjects that look alike differ in one decisive way, that two that look different share a hidden assumption, or that one subject explains something puzzling in the other. That purpose becomes your thesis, and it is what a marker is really grading.
A basis of comparison, sometimes called a frame of reference, is the specific question you put to both subjects. “Compare Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre” is too open; you could compare their settings, their prose styles, their publication histories. “Compare how Elizabeth Bennet and Jane Eyre weigh marriage against independence” gives you a basis, and every paragraph can serve it.
If your instructor sets the subjects, you still choose the basis. If you choose the subjects too, pick a pair with enough in common to make differences meaningful: two thinkers answering the same question, two cities facing the same problem, two translations of the same poem. A good basis passes these tests:
A Venn diagram is a fine start, but a comparison grid is more useful for planning. Put your criteria in rows and your subjects in columns, and fill each cell with a short note and a page reference. The grid below compares Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan (1651) and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government (1689) on the state of nature and government, a classic pairing in political philosophy; the guide to starting the great books suggests reading the two side by side.
Once the grid is filled, read across each row and ask what the difference means. In the Hobbes and Locke grid below, the rows on rights and resistance turn out to depend on the first row: once Locke places rights in the state of nature, a limited government follows. That dependency is the beginning of a thesis.
| Criterion | Hobbes, Leviathan | Locke, Second Treatise |
|---|---|---|
| State of nature | A condition of war of all against all, with no security and no industry | Governed by a law of nature that reason can discover |
| Rights before government | No secure rights; everyone may do whatever preserves them | Natural rights to life, liberty and property |
| Why people form government | To escape fear of violent death | To protect rights and judge disputes impartially |
| Power of the ruler | A sovereign with near-absolute authority | Limited by the purpose it was trusted with |
| Right to resist | Very narrow | People may resist a government that violates its trust |
A compare and contrast thesis names the subjects, the basis and the insight. Weak: “Hobbes and Locke have both similarities and differences in their views of government.” That is true of any two philosophers. Stronger: “Hobbes and Locke both ground government in consent, but because Locke's state of nature already contains rights, his government is limited by them, while Hobbes's sovereign is limited by almost nothing.”
The stronger version tells the reader where the essay is going: it will show the shared starting point, then trace one decisive difference to its consequences. Three thesis shapes work especially well — alike on the surface but different in one decisive way, different on the surface but sharing a hidden assumption, or one subject used as a lens to explain the other. For more on building the sentence, see the guide to writing a thesis statement.
There are two standard ways to organize the body, plus a hybrid. In block structure you discuss everything about subject A, then everything about subject B, and draw the comparison in the second block and the conclusion. In point-by-point structure each paragraph takes one criterion and discusses both subjects. A hybrid gives each subject a short block for context, then compares point by point. Whichever you choose, sketch it first; the guide to outlining an essay shows how.
| Block structure | Point-by-point structure | |
|---|---|---|
| How the body runs | All of subject A, then all of subject B | One criterion per paragraph, both subjects in each |
| Best for | Short essays, or when subject A sets up a lens for B | Longer essays and close, detailed analysis |
| Main risk | Reads as two separate essays joined at the end | Can feel like ping-pong if transitions are weak |
| Outline for Hobbes and Locke | Hobbes's state of nature and sovereign; then Locke's, with comparisons | State of nature; rights; purpose of government; resistance |
From prompt to final draft, this order keeps the comparison purposeful:
Transitions are where a comparison becomes visible. Choose words that state the exact relationship, not just that you are moving on. “On the other hand” is overused and often wrong, since it implies opposition. Use these by function:
The most frequent mistake is the list without a point: paragraph after paragraph of accurate observations that never add up to a claim. Close behind is imbalance, where one subject gets detailed analysis and the other a few sentences, usually because the writer knows one subject better. Check your draft by highlighting each subject in a different color; the page should be roughly balanced.
Other problems are easier to spot. Too many criteria make every comparison shallow, so cut to the three or four that matter most. Comparing things with no real common ground produces an essay with nothing to say. And forgetting the conclusion's job — saying what the comparison as a whole revealed — leaves the reader with parts but no whole.
Comparison means checking two sources against the same question again and again. In Cavua's Work space you can upload both texts, plus any secondary reading, and ask across them at once — “what does each author say people may do when a ruler breaks faith?” — with answers that point to the page in each document. Use “Quiz me” to test whether you remember which thinker held which view.
For the texts themselves, the open catalogue includes philosophy courses you can browse without an account, each with a tutor you can video call, voice call or chat with about that course's lessons.
How to write a conclusion that does more than summarize: restate your thesis in a new light, connect your points, and end on why it matters. With examples.
How to write an essay introduction: open with a precise hook, give only the context the reader needs, and end on your thesis. With examples and a checklist.
Essay structure explained: what goes in the introduction, body and conclusion, how much space each part needs, and how to order body paragraphs so they build.
How to write a literary analysis essay: read closely, build an interpretive thesis, use short quotations as evidence, and show how the text makes its meaning.
How to write an argumentative essay: choose a debatable claim, build reasons with evidence, answer the strongest objection, and pick the right structure.
How to write a thesis statement that makes a clear, arguable claim: a six-step method, examples for each essay type, and fixes for the five common problems.
Comparing looks for similarities between subjects; contrasting looks for differences. In practice, most assignments that use either word want both, because a difference only matters against a shared background and a similarity only matters if the subjects differ elsewhere. If the prompt says “compare” alone, check with your instructor, but a balanced approach is usually expected.
A short essay often has five: an introduction, three body paragraphs and a conclusion. In point-by-point structure, that means three criteria; in block structure, one or two paragraphs per subject. Longer essays add criteria or give each one more than a paragraph. Plan by the number of criteria your basis needs, not by a fixed count.
Neither is better in general. Point-by-point usually produces closer analysis and keeps the comparison constant, so it suits longer essays. Block structure is simpler and works for short essays, or when one subject provides the framework for reading the other. If you use block structure, make sure the second block refers back to the first throughout.
Yes, but it gets harder to stay balanced and deep. With three subjects, point-by-point structure works best, since block structure produces three separate summaries. Keep the criteria few and the thesis focused on what comparing all three reveals. If the word limit is tight, two subjects compared well usually beat three compared thinly.
Open by showing why these subjects belong together: a shared question, a common setting, or a surprising link. Give brief context on each, then state your basis of comparison and a thesis that says what the comparison reveals. Avoid opening with “There are many similarities and differences between…”, which could begin any comparison essay.
Every Cavua course comes with a 24/7 tutor you can video call, speak to or chat with — on the material you are actually studying.